Every two years, tenants across Japan receive the same notice in the mail: a renewal is due, and a payment — often several hundred dollars, sometimes well over a thousand — is expected before the lease continues. For international investors and expatriate tenants coming from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, or Singapore, the first question is almost always the same one we hear from Japanese tenants: "What exactly am I paying for, and how much should this actually cost?"
This is a uniquely Japanese question, because the underlying custom — the kōshinryō (更新料, "lease renewal fee") — has no direct equivalent in Anglophone rental markets. In the US, UK, and Australia, a lease renewal is typically just a continuation (or re-signing) of the tenancy at the same or a renegotiated rent; landlords do not charge a separate one-time fee simply for agreeing to keep the same tenant. In Japan, that one-time payment to the landlord is a distinct, named line item — separate from rent, separate from the deposit, and, as this guide will show, separate again from the administrative fee charged by the leasing agent.
There is a second surprise waiting for readers used to Western property markets: Japan does not have a continuously updated, publicly searchable database of actual transacted rents or renewal fees — nothing resembling the UK's Land Registry price-paid data, the multi-listing-service ecosystem many US markets rely on for comparables, or Australia's state-run rent bond registries. The single most comprehensive cross-prefecture survey of renewal fee practices the Japanese government has ever published dates back to June 2007 — nearly two decades old — and, as we explain in detail below, no equivalent nationwide survey has replaced it since, precisely because the renewal fee is a market custom rather than a regulated instrument. This guide exists to fill exactly that gap: using only primary data from Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (国土交通省, MLIT), the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (総務省, MIC), the National Tax Agency (国税庁, NTA), and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働省, MHLW), we translate that scattered official data into numbers you can apply directly to your own rent in Japan. Every figure below states which year's survey it comes from, because in a market without continuous public reporting, knowing the vintage of a number is as important as the number itself.
This article is written for three groups of readers: those who want to know the real, itemized cost of the renewal fee and the renewal administrative fee; those who want to negotiate rent at the renewal point; and those who are struggling to come up with the renewal payment and need to know their options. All amounts are given in Japanese yen with an approximate US dollar conversion in parentheses (using an indicative rate of ¥150 = USD 1 as of 2026-08; check current rates for precise figures).
Here is the bottom line up front. The renewal fee is not a uniform national rate — it ranges from 0 months' rent to 1.4 months' rent depending on the prefecture. The most recent cross-prefecture government survey, published by MLIT in June 2007 (Heisei 19), found average renewal fees of 1.0 month's rent in Tokyo, 0.8 months in Kanagawa, and 0 months in Osaka, where the custom does not exist at all. Separately from the renewal fee paid to the landlord, a "renewal administrative fee" (更新事務手数料, kōshin jimu tesūryō) paid to the leasing or management agent applied to 44.4% of households in the FY2025 (Reiwa 7) survey — and about 70% of those charged exactly one month's rent for it.
This article's key takeaways
- The "one to two months' rent" figure often quoted for renewal fees is not accurate. In MLIT's primary data, all 16 surveyed prefectures average 1.4 months or less, and most cluster around 0.5 months.
- The renewal fee is not the only charge due at renewal. Four separate items can appear on the same invoice: the renewal fee itself, the renewal administrative fee, fire insurance premiums, and the rent-guarantee company's renewal guarantee fee — and each has a different payee and different legal basis.
- Using the three-major-metro-area average rent of ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) as a baseline, the two-year cash outlay at renewal ranges from ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) in an Osaka-pattern lease to ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112) in a Tokyo-pattern lease and ¥200,114 (approx. USD 1,334) in a Kyoto-pattern lease — more than double depending purely on where the property is located.
- Tenants have a statutory basis for requesting a rent reduction at renewal under Article 32 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法, Shakuchi Shakuya Hō). That said, Japan's official private-sector rent index moved only +0.6% year-on-year as of June 2026, so requesting that rent stay flat is a far more realistic ask than requesting a large cut.
- If you cannot pay the renewal fee, Japan's Housing Security Benefit (住居確保給付金, Jūkyo Kakuho Kyūfukin) covers rent — but explicitly does not cover the renewal fee. The two problems need two separate solutions: apply for the benefit for rent, and negotiate directly with the landlord or management company for the renewal fee itself.
How Much Is the Renewal Fee? Collection Rates and Average Amounts by Prefecture
The first place to look for renewal fee benchmarks is MLIT's "Survey on the Actual Conditions of Private Rental Housing (Real Estate Agents)" (民間賃貸住宅に係る実態調査(不動産業者)), published on June 29, 2007. The ministry distributed questionnaires to 934 rental-housing management companies belonging to the Japan Rental Housing Management Association, received 204 responses (a 21.8% response rate), and tabulated 175 valid responses to the questions specifically about one-time payments. As of August 2026, this remains — as far as we have been able to confirm — the only public data source that maps renewal fee collection rates and average amounts across multiple prefectures. Readers accustomed to the depth of US MLS comparable-sales data or UK Land Registry price-paid records may find this striking: for a market custom this common, there simply is no more current, more granular public dataset.
Renewal Fee Collection Rates and Average Months in 16 Prefectures
The data covers properties leased between April 2005 and March 2006. "Collection rate" is the share of properties in that prefecture that charge a renewal fee at all; "average (months)" is the average fee, expressed as a multiple of monthly rent, among properties that do charge one.
| Prefecture | Renewal Fee Collection Rate | Average (Months' Rent) |
|---|---|---|
| Hokkaido | 28.5% | 0.1 months |
| Miyagi | 0.2% | 0.5 months |
| Tokyo | 65.0% | 1.0 months |
| Kanagawa | 90.1% | 0.8 months |
| Saitama | 61.6% | 0.5 months |
| Chiba | 82.9% | 1.0 months |
| Nagano | 34.3% | 0.5 months |
| Toyama | 17.8% | 0.5 months |
| Aichi | 40.6% | 0.5 months |
| Kyoto | 55.1% | 1.4 months |
| Osaka | 0% | N/A |
| Hyogo | 0% | N/A |
| Hiroshima | 19.1% | 0.2 months |
| Ehime | 13.2% | 0.5 months |
| Fukuoka | 23.3% | 0.5 months |
| Okinawa | 40.4% | 0.5 months |
Source: MLIT, "Survey on the Actual Conditions of Private Rental Housing (Real Estate Agents)" (民間賃貸住宅に係る実態調査(不動産業者)), June 2007, 175 valid responses (press release)
Three things stand out from this table. First, in the Greater Tokyo metro area, the renewal fee is close to standard practice — Kanagawa at 90.1%, Chiba at 82.9%, Tokyo at 65.0% — while in Osaka and Hyogo it sits at 0%; the custom simply does not exist there. Second, a high collection rate does not mean a high amount: Kanagawa charges the fee on nine out of ten properties but averages only 0.8 months, lower than Tokyo's 1.0 month. Third, the highest average is Kyoto at 1.4 months — even though Kyoto's collection rate of 55.1% is only mid-range, the amount charged when it does apply is the heaviest in the country. For a reader used to a single national or state-level norm (as in most US states, where lease renewal terms are set by the individual lease rather than by regional custom), this prefecture-by-prefecture patchwork — where whether a fee applies, and how much, can differ entirely between neighboring prefectures — is itself a distinctly Japanese feature of the rental market, rooted in regional custom rather than statute.
Is "One to Two Months' Rent" Accurate? The Primary Data Says Mostly Around 0.5 Months
You will often see renewal fees described generically as "one to two months' rent." Measured against the primary data above, that range overstates the actual practice. Of the 16 prefectures surveyed, only Kyoto exceeds one month, at 1.4 months; Tokyo and Chiba sit at exactly 1.0 month; and the remaining 11 regions fall between 0.1 and 0.8 months. A figure of "2 months" does not appear for any prefecture in this survey.
If your renewal notice states a fee of two months' rent, that figure is well above the regional averages shown here. As we explain below, the Japanese Supreme Court has treated an excessively high renewal fee — one disproportionate to the rent and the renewal period — as a narrow exception to an otherwise valid fee clause. It is worth checking your lease's renewal fee clause directly and asking your management company to explain both the amount and its basis before you pay.
Why the Data Stops at 2007, and How to Read It Correctly Today
The reason no equivalent nationwide survey has followed is that the renewal fee is a commercial custom with no basis in statute — not a regulated fee that the government tracks as a matter of course. MLIT's "Casebook of Consultation Responses on Private Rental Housing (Revised Edition)" (民間賃貸住宅に関する相談対応事例集(再改訂版), March 2022) states explicitly that the renewal fee "has no basis in law and is not necessarily a nationwide custom, and for that reason is not included in MLIT's Standard Rental Housing Lease Agreement." Because it is not a formal institution, it has never been the subject of ongoing statistical monitoring — which is precisely why the 2007 figures remain the newest cross-prefecture snapshot available.
For that reason, the right way to read this table is not as a "2026 price list" but as a map of how strongly the custom is entrenched in each region. It is a survey now close to two decades old, and collection rates and average months may have shifted since. If you need the exact figure that applies to you, use this table to gauge your region's general level, then treat the renewal fee clause actually written in your own lease as the authoritative number. If your lease contains no renewal fee clause at all, there is no legal basis for a landlord to demand one at renewal — full stop.
What You Actually Pay at Renewal: A Breakdown of Costs and Example Calculations
Renewal-time expenses are not limited to the renewal fee. In practice, four separate items are billed at the same time: the renewal fee, the renewal administrative fee, the fire insurance premium, and the rent-guarantee company's renewal guarantee fee. Each has a different payee and a different legal character, so separating them out is the starting point for judging whether any individual amount is reasonable. A tenant coming from a market where "lease renewal" means simply re-signing the same document — with no itemized invoice at all — should expect this bundled billing to be the single most concrete difference between renewing a lease in Japan and renewing one at home.
Comparing the Four Costs Billed at Renewal
| Cost | Payee | Primary data behind the going rate | Consumption tax (residential/commercial) | Legal basis | Room to negotiate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewal fee | Landlord | MLIT 2007 survey: Tokyo 1.0 month, Kanagawa 0.8 months, Osaka 0 months, etc. | Exempt / Taxable | No basis in law; the lease clause is the basis | Yes — if it diverges from the regional norm, you can request an explanation |
| Renewal administrative fee | Leasing/management agent | FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey: applies to 44.4% of households, 69.7% of which pay exactly one month | Taxable (consideration for services) | No basis in law; billed as an actual cost of the entrustment/brokerage service | Yes — you can request an itemized breakdown of the work performed |
| Fire insurance premium | Insurance company (usually via an agent) | Varies by product; no official statistics | Exempt (insurance premium) | Usually a contractual obligation stated in a special clause | Yes — in principle, the landlord cannot mandate a specific insurer |
| Rent-guarantee renewal fee | Rent-guarantee company | Varies by product; no official statistics | Exempt (credit guarantee fee) | Based on the guarantee entrustment contract | Limited — it recurs for as long as the guarantee contract continues |
Of these four items, fire insurance premiums and rent-guarantee renewal fees have no nationwide public statistics behind them at all. To judge whether either amount is reasonable, check the actual figure and renewal cycle stated in your insurance policy and your guarantee entrustment contract directly. On the tax treatment: both the fire insurance premium and the rent-guarantee fee are consumption-tax exempt. The National Tax Agency lists "insurance premiums" and "credit guarantee fees" among the categories of tax-exempt transactions (NTA Tax Answer No. 6201, "Transactions Exempt from Consumption Tax"). If the guarantee company's invoice lists an administrative handling fee as a separate line item, however, that portion is taxable as consideration for a service. We break down the cost structure of rent-guarantee companies in more detail in our guide to typical rent-guarantee fee levels and fee structures.
On the distinction between the renewal fee and the renewal administrative fee, the government's own survey form draws a clean line. The FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey questionnaire instructs respondents: "Do not include the renewal fee paid to the landlord under the renewal administrative fee entry — record only the administrative fee for renewal-related work paid to the leasing agent." The framework is straightforward: the renewal fee is a one-time payment to the landlord, and the renewal administrative fee is consideration for the agent's work. If your invoice lists only a single "renewal fee" figure with no breakdown, we recommend asking for the two amounts to be shown separately — it is the single most common source of confusion we see tenants run into at renewal time.
The Latest Data on Renewal Administrative Fees (FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey)
The newest primary data on renewal costs is MLIT's FY2025 (Reiwa 7) Housing Market Trend Survey, with its report published in July 2026 (Reiwa 8). For the private rental housing segment, 600 questionnaires were distributed to households and 590 were returned (a 98.3% response rate), over a survey period running from September 1 to December 9, 2025, covering households that moved between April 2024 and March 2025. One caveat worth flagging clearly: the private rental housing portion of this survey is limited to the three major metropolitan areas (Greater Tokyo, Chukyo/Nagoya, and Kinki/Osaka) — these are not nationwide averages, even though they are frequently cited as if they were.
| Item | FY2025 Results |
|---|---|
| Whether a renewal administrative fee applies | Yes 44.4% / No 37.3% / No answer 18.3% |
| Renewal administrative fee, in months | Exactly 1 month 69.7% / Less than 1 month 11.8% / More than 1, less than 2 months 12.6% |
| Monthly rent | Average ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) / Median ¥74,000 (approx. USD 493) (Greater Tokyo ¥94,068 [approx. USD 627]; Chukyo ¥63,447 [approx. USD 423]; Kinki ¥71,965 [approx. USD 480]) |
| Common area fee | Average ¥4,837 (approx. USD 32) |
| Security deposit / guarantee money | Applies 51.9% (of which exactly 1 month 64.4%) |
| Key money (reikin) | Applies 43.1% / Does not apply 45.8% (of those that apply, exactly 1 month 73.4%) |
| Brokerage commission | Applies 48.0% / Does not apply 37.1% (of those that apply, exactly 1 month 69.7%) |
| Type of lease | Ordinary lease (futsū shakuya) 92.5% / Fixed-term lease (teiki shakuya) 2.0% |
Source: MLIT, "FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey Report" (令和7年度 住宅市場動向調査報告書) (July 2026; private rental housing households, 590 valid responses, three major metro areas)
The key pattern here is that the renewal administrative fee applies to just under half of households, and when it does apply, it is almost always exactly one month's rent. In other words, the renewal administrative fee is a cost item where the total swings far more on whether it applies at all than on its amount once it does. When your renewal notice arrives, checking whether this line item is present should be your very first step — before you even look at the number attached to it. For a reader used to US or UK leasing, where a renewal is typically handled directly between landlord and tenant with no separate agent fee at all, this is the item most likely to feel like an unexplained surprise charge — which is exactly why confirming its presence and amount early is worth the extra email to your management company.
A Two-Year Renewal Simulation on an ¥83,381 (Approx. USD 556) Rent
To make the numbers concrete, we hold the FY2025 survey's three-major-metro-area average rent of ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) constant and swap in each region's average renewal fee in months. The renewal administrative fee is set at 1.0 month's rent — the most common amount in the same survey.
| Regional pattern (average renewal fee, months) | Renewal fee | Renewal administrative fee (1.0 month) | Total at two-year renewal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osaka/Hyogo pattern (0 months) | ¥0 (USD 0) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) |
| Saitama/Aichi/Fukuoka pattern (0.5 months) | ¥41,691 (approx. USD 278) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥125,072 (approx. USD 834) |
| Kanagawa pattern (0.8 months) | ¥66,705 (approx. USD 445) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥150,086 (approx. USD 1,001) |
| Tokyo/Chiba pattern (1.0 month) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112) |
| Kyoto pattern (1.4 months) | ¥116,733 (approx. USD 778) | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | ¥200,114 (approx. USD 1,334) |
On identical rent, regional custom alone produces a 2.4x spread — from ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) to ¥200,114 (approx. USD 1,334) every two years. The actual average rent in Greater Tokyo is higher, at ¥94,068 (approx. USD 627); if you are in a Tokyo property charging 1.0 month for both the renewal fee and the renewal administrative fee, your real two-year renewal cost lands around ¥188,136 (approx. USD 1,254).
The actual cash you need every two years is this subtotal plus two years of fire insurance premiums and the rent-guarantee renewal fee. Since neither of those two items has public benchmark data, add the exact figures from your own insurance policy and guarantee entrustment contract to arrive at your personal total. Budgeting for that full amount roughly three months before your renewal date is the single most effective way to avoid a last-minute scramble.
Is the Renewal Fee Subject to Consumption Tax? (Exempt for Residential, Taxable for Commercial)
Whether Japan's consumption tax applies to the renewal fee depends entirely on whether the building is residential or commercial. NTA Tax Answer No. 6225 treats the non-refundable portion of deposits, key money, security deposits, and renewal fees associated with signing or renewing a residential lease as exempt from consumption tax, while treating the same categories of payment as taxable for commercial buildings such as offices.
That means if consumption tax has been added on top of the renewal fee for your own residential unit, it is possibly a billing error. The check is simple: confirm that the renewal fee stated in your renewal notice is exactly "months × monthly rent," with nothing added. On an ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) rent with a 1.0-month renewal fee, the correct figure is ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556); a figure like ¥91,719 (approx. USD 611) — roughly 1.1x the base amount — indicates that consumption tax has been incorrectly layered on top. The renewal administrative fee, by contrast, is consideration for the agent's service, so consumption tax being applied there is correct.
Source: National Tax Agency, "Tax Answer No. 6225: Land Rent, House Rent, Key Money, Security Deposits, and Related Items" (地代、家賃や権利金、敷金など) (law and regulations current as of April 1, 2025)
Why Does the Renewal Fee Exist? Legal Basis and the Supreme Court Precedent
The renewal fee has no basis in Japanese statute at all. A payment obligation arises only when the lease agreement itself contains a renewal fee clause. Understanding this one point clarifies exactly what to check when a renewal notice arrives — and it is worth pausing on, because it means the fee's entire legal force comes from contract law, not from any tenancy statute the way, say, a security deposit cap might in some US states.
The Government's Own Standard Lease Contains No Renewal Fee Clause
MLIT publishes a model lease template, the "Standard Rental Housing Lease Agreement" (賃貸住宅標準契約書), and it contains no renewal fee clause whatsoever. The ministry's "Casebook of Consultation Responses on Private Rental Housing (Revised Edition)" (March 2022, compiled by the Research Group on Consultation Responses to Rental Housing Disputes) explains why: the renewal fee has no basis in law and is not a nationwide custom. In short, the renewal fee is not part of what the national government considers a standard lease term at all — it is a regional-custom add-on that individual landlords and management companies choose to include in their own contracts.
Supreme Court, July 15, 2011 (Heisei 23): The Issue Was Article 10 of the Consumer Contract Act
The validity of renewal fee clauses was contested for years, with lower courts reaching inconsistent conclusions. The matter was settled by the Second Petty Bench of the Supreme Court of Japan on July 15, 2011 (Heisei 23) (Minshū Vol. 65, No. 5, p. 2269). The question at issue was whether a renewal fee clause violates Article 10 of the Consumer Contract Act (消費者契約法, Shōhisha Keiyaku Hō — Japan's general statute voiding contract terms that unfairly harm a consumer's interests) and is therefore void.
The Supreme Court held that the renewal fee has a composite legal character — functioning in part as a supplement to or prepayment of rent, and in part as consideration for continuing the lease — and ruled that a renewal fee clause stated clearly and specifically in the lease agreement does not unilaterally harm the consumer's interests under Article 10 of the Consumer Contract Act, unless special circumstances exist, such as the fee being excessively high relative to the rent amount and the renewal period.
This ruling has two practical implications. First, when the amount and payment timing are stated clearly in the lease, the renewal fee clause is valid as a general rule, and a tenant refusing to pay unilaterally has little legal ground to stand on. Second, an exception remains for fees that are "excessively high." The casebook cited above also notes that it is important to discuss the matter with the landlord while considering whether the amount diverges significantly from the regional custom and going rate, and that where the two sides cannot reach agreement, applying for mediation is a possible next step.
One point that is easy to misread deserves a note here. The specific clause the Supreme Court upheld as valid in this case charged a renewal fee of two months' rent for a one-year renewal period — a rate above the regional averages shown earlier in this guide. In other words, a fee being higher than the local norm is not, by itself, grounds to void the clause. If you are not satisfied with the amount, the realistic path forward is not to assert the clause is invalid, but to request an explanation of the basis for the amount and then negotiate the terms directly with the landlord.
This is a meaningful contrast for readers from jurisdictions with statutory renewal-fee caps or outright bans on lease renewal charges: Japan's courts have chosen to police the outer bound of reasonableness case by case, rather than fix a hard ceiling in the statute itself, which is why the regional data in the first section of this guide is the closest thing to a benchmark a tenant actually has.
Why Landlords Charge a Renewal Fee (One-Time Income 53.0% / Long-Standing Custom 50.4%)
As negotiating material, understanding the landlord's own motivation makes the conversation easier to structure. In the 2007 survey cited above, 117 valid respondents were asked (multiple answers allowed) why they collect a renewal fee. The most common answer was "counted on as a one-time source of income," at 53.0%, followed by "long-standing custom" at 50.4%, "compensating for lower rent" at 21.4%, and "a funding source for wear-and-tear repairs" at 20.5%.
In other words, roughly half of the renewal fee custom rests on business income planning and the other half on habit. When negotiating a reduction, the "it's just custom" reasoning is where regional data — like the table in the first section of this guide — gives you the most leverage; the portion already built into the landlord's income plan is harder to give up. Understanding this split, the more productive conversation is usually not about the renewal fee in isolation, but about the whole package — equipment upgrades, rent terms, and the fee together — where both sides have more room to trade.
How Lease Renewal Works in Japan: Agreed Renewal, Statutory Renewal, and Fixed-Term Leases
Japanese lease renewal takes one of two forms: gōi kōshin (合意更新, "agreed renewal" by mutual consent of both parties) and hōtei kōshin (法定更新, "statutory renewal," which occurs automatically by operation of the Act on Land and Building Leases). Which one applies changes both the length of the resulting lease term and how the renewal fee clause is treated — a distinction with no exact parallel in US at-will or fixed-term tenancy law, where a lease that isn't actively renewed simply ends or converts to month-to-month by the terms of the lease itself, not by a default statutory rule layered on top.
Why Two-Year Leases Are the Norm (Article 29, Paragraph 1, Act on Land and Building Leases)
The reason two-year lease terms are so common in Japan traces back to Article 29, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法, Shakuchi Shakuya Hō — the core statute governing Japanese tenancy law). That provision states that a building lease with a term of less than one year "shall be deemed a lease of unspecified term." If a lease is set for under a year, it is legally treated as if it had no fixed term at all, and the landlord then needs "just cause" (正当事由, seitō jiyū, under Article 28) to terminate it — a materially harder standard for a landlord to manage around. As a result, terms of one year or longer, and in practice most commonly two years, are the market norm.
What Happens Under Statutory Renewal (Article 26, Act on Land and Building Leases)
Article 26, Paragraph 1 provides that if the landlord fails to give notice of non-renewal (or notice that renewal is conditional on changed terms) between one year and six months before the lease expires, the lease is deemed renewed on the same terms as before. Critically, the renewed lease's term is then treated as unspecified — it has no defined end date. Even where the landlord did give proper notice, if the tenant continues to occupy the unit after expiration and the landlord does not promptly object, the same deemed-renewal outcome applies (Paragraph 2 of the same article).
This has three practical implications. First, forgetting to complete the renewal paperwork does not cause the lease to lapse or the tenant to be evicted. Second, after statutory renewal the lease becomes one of unspecified term, so the concept of a "next renewal date" disappears entirely. Third, whether the renewal fee clause still applies under statutory renewal depends entirely on the exact wording of your lease. A clause that reads "the renewal fee is payable in the case of agreed renewal" can reasonably be read as not extending to statutory renewal, while a clause that says broadly "in the case of renewal" can become a genuine point of dispute. Checking exactly how this one sentence is worded is the first thing to look at in any consultation about statutory renewal.
It's also worth noting that a non-renewal notice alone does not automatically require the tenant to move out. For a landlord to refuse renewal, they need "just cause" under Article 28, which requires weighing, in combination: how much the landlord and tenant each genuinely need to use the building, the history of the tenancy, how the building has been used, its physical condition, and any offer of a relocation payment (立退料, tachinokiryō) or similar financial consideration.
Contrast this with the US, where most jurisdictions allow a landlord simply to decline to renew a fixed-term lease at expiration without cause (subject to fair-housing and, in some cities, just-cause eviction ordinances), or the UK, where an assured shorthold tenancy can likewise end at the fixed term without the landlord needing to show cause via a Section 21 notice. Japan's default position runs the opposite direction: once a tenancy exists, the burden sits with the landlord to justify ending it, and simple non-renewal is far from sufficient on its own.
Ordinary Leases vs. Fixed-Term Leases, Compared
| Item | Ordinary Lease (futsū shakuya) | Fixed-Term Lease (teiki shakuya) |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory basis | Articles 26, 28, 29, Act on Land and Building Leases | Article 38, Act on Land and Building Leases |
| Method of formation | Valid even without a written document | Must be in writing such as a notarized deed (electronic records permitted) |
| Renewal | Renews (statutory renewal applies) | No renewal — ends at expiration |
| Pre-signing explanation | No specific requirement | Landlord must deliver and explain a separate document stating the lease will not renew; failure voids the no-renewal provision (Art. 38(5)) |
| Requirement for landlord to end the lease | Just cause required (Art. 28) | No just cause required |
| End-of-term notice | Non-renewal notice 1 year to 6 months before expiration (Art. 26(1)) | For terms of 1 year or more, termination notice 1 year to 6 months before expiration (Art. 38(6)) |
| Tenant's mid-term termination | Governed by the lease's special provisions | Permitted for residential units under 200 m² for unavoidable reasons such as job transfer, medical treatment, or caring for a family member (Art. 38(7)) |
| Actual usage (FY2025) | 92.5% | 2.0% |
| Fee equivalent to the renewal fee | Renewal fee | Re-contracting fee (a re-contract is treated as a brand-new lease) |
Source: e-Gov Japanese Law Search, Act on Land and Building Leases; MLIT, "FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey Report"
Fixed-term leases remain poorly understood even among Japanese tenants: in the FY2025 survey, only 17.1% said they "know" the system, 24.6% said they "know the name only," and 54.4% said they "don't know it at all." You can determine which type your own lease is by checking two things: whether the contract's title or Article 1 reads "Fixed-Term Building Lease Agreement" (定期建物賃貸借契約), and whether you received a separate explanatory document stating that the lease will not renew. We cover the full distinction in more depth in our guide to the difference between ordinary and fixed-term leases.
For a Singaporean or UK reader, teiki shakuya has some resemblance to a strict fixed-term tenancy that genuinely ends at the term date with no statutory holdover right — but the key difference is that it is the rare exception in Japan (2.0% of leases), not the default, and it requires the landlord to jump through a specific pre-signing disclosure hoop or lose the fixed-term protection entirely.
Three Things to Check When Renewing a Rented Condominium Unit (Bunjō Chintai)
When you rent an individually owned unit in a strata-titled condominium — known in Japan as bunjō chintai (分譲賃貸, a condominium unit owned by an individual investor and leased out, as distinct from a purpose-built rental apartment block owned by a single corporate landlord) — the legal treatment of renewal is identical to any other rental. But because the landlord is typically an individual owner rather than a professional leasing company, three points tend to differ in practice.
- Whether a renewal fee clause exists at all varies widely by owner. Instead of a management company's standard-form contract, some bunjō chintai leases use a document the individual owner drafted or had drafted independently, so both the presence and the amount of any renewal fee differ property by property. Check the actual clause in your own lease directly rather than assuming a regional norm applies.
- Confirm in advance who actually handles the renewal. The condominium building's overall management association (kanri kumiai, 管理組合, the body of unit owners that governs the shared building) is a separate entity from whichever management company handles your specific lease. Keep a record of who sends your renewal documents and who to contact with questions, so the process doesn't stall on a wrong-department email.
- Changes to the building's house rules can be folded into your renewed lease. Conditions on pet ownership, playing musical instruments, bicycle parking, and similar matters can be newly added to your contract terms at renewal. The casebook cited earlier also emphasizes that when a new special provision is added at renewal, it is important to ask for an explanation and discuss it thoroughly before agreeing.
We cover the broader characteristics of renting a bunjō chintai unit — an option many international tenants find offers a wider variety of finishes and floor plans than purpose-built rental blocks — in our guide to the pros and cons of renting a condominium unit.
Can You Negotiate Rent at Renewal?
Yes. In fact, renewal is the single most natural moment for a tenant to raise the subject of rent at all. Simply saying "this feels expensive, please lower it" will not move the conversation forward, however. Attaching a legal basis and public data points gives the landlord or management company an actual foundation to evaluate the request on, rather than a subjective impression to push back against.
The Legal Basis: Article 32 Rent Reduction Requests Under the Act on Land and Building Leases
Article 32, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Land and Building Leases provides that when a building's rent becomes unreasonable — due to a change in taxes or other burdens, a rise or fall in land and building prices or other economic conditions, or a divergence from the rent of comparable nearby buildings of the same kind — either party may request a rent adjustment for the future, regardless of what the contract itself says. A tenant's right to request a reduction is written directly into this same provision, on equal footing with the landlord's right to request an increase.
In practice, the most usable ground is the "comparison to nearby comparable buildings" clause. What are other units in your own building, or similarly aged and sized units within walking distance, currently listed for? That is your most concrete piece of evidence. Two carve-outs are worth flagging: if your lease contains a special provision agreeing not to raise rent for a set period, that provision controls instead (the proviso to Article 32, Paragraph 1); and Article 32 does not apply at all to fixed-term leases that contain their own rent-revision special provision (Article 38, Paragraph 9). We go through how to actually apply this article step by step in our guide to Article 32 rent adjustment requests.
For readers used to US rent-control ordinances that cap annual increases by a fixed percentage, or UK Section 13 notices that a tenant can challenge before a First-tier Tribunal, Article 32 works differently: it is a two-way statutory right with no numeric cap built in, resolved first through direct negotiation and, failing that, through court-annexed mediation (chōtei, 調停) rather than a rent tribunal — placing more weight on the comparable-rent evidence you personally bring to the table than either system does.
Public Rent Indicators You Can Use as Negotiating Material
While "comparable nearby" listings have to be researched property by property, the broader market trend is documented in public statistics. The following two datasets are objective evidence you can bring directly into a renewal conversation.
| Indicator | Figure | What it means for negotiation |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Price Index, private-sector rent (June 2026, year-on-year) | +0.6% (index 101.4) / wood-frame +0.1% (100.8) / non-wood +0.8% (101.6) | Rent has moved less than 1% in a year. If you're offered an increase, you can reasonably ask for its basis. |
| Same index, all items (June 2026, year-on-year) | +1.7% (index 113.6) | Overall prices are rising, but rent has not kept pace. |
| Same index, public/UR/public-corporation rent | +1.0% (index 102.8) | Even public-sector rental rates moved only about 1%. A large private-sector increase needs a specific explanation. |
| Housing and Land Survey, private rental housing (wood-frame), 2023 | ¥54,409 (approx. USD 363) (+4.5% vs. 2018) | That's the five-year growth — under 1% a year on average. |
| Same survey, private rental housing (non-wood), 2023 | ¥68,548 (approx. USD 457) (+7.0% vs. 2018) | Non-wood construction has risen more than wood-frame. |
| Same survey, all rental housing (dedicated residential), 2023 | ¥59,656 (approx. USD 398) (+7.1% vs. 2018) | A nationwide baseline for gauging where your own rent sits. |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (総務省, MIC), "2020-Base Consumer Price Index, Nationwide, June 2026 (Reiwa 8)"; MIC Statistics Bureau, "2023 (Reiwa 5) Housing and Land Survey, Basic Tabulation on Housing and Households, Results"
The conclusion this data supports is straightforward: market rents are moving less than 1% a year. That makes it hard to build a market-data case for a large reduction at renewal, but it gives you solid backing for two much more modest, much more winnable requests: "please keep the rent flat," or "please explain the basis for this increase." We cover exactly how to respond if you're presented with a rent increase in our guide to the conditions under which a tenant can refuse a renewal rent increase, and how to negotiate it.
Timing and Approach: Act Before the Renewal Notice Arrives
The right window to raise the subject is before the renewal notice itself arrives — roughly four to six months before the lease's expiration date. The reason is that once the renewal notice has been sent, the terms have already been finalized internally by the management company, and changing them afterward requires reopening a decision that's already been made. Raising the issue before the terms are locked in gives the landlord genuine room to consider it.
The most practical approach follows this order. First, state clearly that you intend to stay — vacancy is a landlord's single largest cost, so a long-term tenant's stated intention to remain is itself powerful leverage. Second, present concrete comparable listings from the same building or nearby. Third, narrow your ask to one item; asking simultaneously for a lower rent, a lower renewal fee, and equipment upgrades scatters the discussion and rarely reaches a conclusion. Fourth, put whatever is verbally agreed into writing, in the renewal agreement itself or in a signed memorandum — a verbal "yes" with nothing on paper is not something you can rely on two years later.
What a landlord wants to avoid most is a vacancy period followed by the cost of finding a new tenant. Framing your request with that priority in mind is what makes a reasonable landing point achievable.
Staying and Paying the Renewal Fee vs. Moving to a No-Renewal-Fee Property
We frequently hear the question: "wouldn't it be cheaper to just move than to keep paying the renewal fee?" Using the ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) rent figure as a baseline, here is how the numbers compare over a six-year holding period.
First, staying in the same unit for six years means two renewals (at year 2 and year 4). Simply doubling the two-year figures calculated earlier gives ¥333,524 (approx. USD 2,223) for the Tokyo/Chiba pattern, ¥250,144 (approx. USD 1,668) for the Saitama/Aichi/Fukuoka pattern, ¥400,228 (approx. USD 2,668) for the Kyoto pattern, and ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112) for the Osaka/Hyogo pattern.
Second, here is the up-front cost of moving instead. Building from the FY2025 survey's incidence rates and typical amounts:
| Cost item | Incidence rate (FY2025) | Amount if it applies (¥83,381 / 1 month rent) | Refundable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key money (reikin) | Applies 43.1% / Does not apply 45.8% | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | Not refundable |
| Brokerage commission | Applies 48.0% / Does not apply 37.1% | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | Not refundable |
| Security deposit (shikikin) | Applies 51.9% | ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556) | Partially or fully refunded after restoration-cost settlement |
Adding up only the non-refundable amounts gives ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112), before moving-company fees, the old unit's restoration-cost settlement, and the new unit's fire insurance and guarantee entrustment fees are even added. That is where the break-even point starts to come into view. Note that the renewal administrative fee is a cost that can recur at your new address too, at its own future renewal — so the comparison below isolates the renewal fee specifically.
- Tokyo/Chiba pattern (1.0-month renewal fee): one renewal costs ¥83,381 (approx. USD 556), against a non-refundable moving cost of ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112). The math only breaks even after two renewals — and once you add actual moving-company fees on top, staying put comes out ahead.
- Saitama/Aichi/Fukuoka pattern (0.5-month renewal fee): one renewal costs ¥41,691 (approx. USD 278). Paying it twice over six years still totals only ¥83,382 (approx. USD 556) — moving is clearly the worse deal here.
- Kyoto pattern (1.4-month renewal fee): one renewal costs ¥116,733 (approx. USD 778), and two renewals total ¥233,466 (approx. USD 1,556) — which exceeds the ¥166,762 (approx. USD 1,112) non-refundable cost of moving. If you're planning to stay four years or more, moving genuinely becomes a viable option to weigh here.
There's a significant caveat behind this comparison, though. In the FY2025 survey, 45.8% of leases had no key money and 37.1% had no brokerage commission, so depending on the specific property you land on, the up-front cost of moving can shrink close to zero. Put differently, what actually determines whether moving pays off is not the size of the renewal fee itself, but your new unit's initial move-in costs and whether the new rent is genuinely lower. We break down what those initial move-in costs consist of in our guide to Japan rental initial costs and five ways to reduce them.
What to Do If You Can't Pay the Renewal Fee
If you can't come up with the amount requested at renewal, the one thing you should not do is let the due date pass without any contact at all. There are three broad options available, and each has a different character.
First, Talk to the Management Company or Landlord About a Payment Plan or Reduction
Because the renewal fee is a purely contractual amount with no legal mandate behind it, the two parties are free to agree on an installment plan or a reduced amount. When you raise this, communicate three specific things: that you intend to pay, exactly what amount you can pay by exactly what date, and that you want to continue living there.
Here is official data showing how often renewal-related disputes actually occur: MLIT's "Survey on Rental Housing Management Operations (Tenants)" (賃貸住宅管理業務に関するアンケート調査(入居者)) (conducted July 31–August 1, 2019, a web survey of 310 tenants).
| Item | Share who experienced it (of 94 tenants who reported any trouble; multiple answers allowed) | Share who consider it serious if it happens (of all 310 respondents; up to 5 selections) |
|---|---|---|
| Couldn't agree on the renewal fee or administrative fee | 4.3% (4 respondents) | 3.5% |
| Wanted to stay but renewal was refused | 2.1% (2 respondents) | 14.5% |
| Asked for an unexpected rent increase at renewal | 1.1% (1 respondent) | 13.2% |
Source: MLIT, "Survey on Rental Housing Management Operations (Tenants)" (survey overview; of 310 respondents, 30.3% — 94 tenants — reported having experienced some form of trouble)
Because the underlying counts are small (just 1 to 4 respondents), treat the incidence rates as directional rather than precise. But the pattern itself is clear: renewal disputes are uncommon overall, yet when they do arise, what tenants view as genuinely serious is less about the dollar amount and more about the continuity of the tenancy itself — being refused renewal, or facing an unexpected rent hike. The same survey found that 10.1% of tenants cited "insufficient explanation at lease renewal" as a dissatisfaction with their management company's service. If you're not satisfied with an amount, the fastest way to resolve it before it escalates is simply to ask for a clear explanation of what each charge is for and how it was calculated.
The Housing Security Benefit Covers Rent — Not the Renewal Fee
If a drop in income has made it hard to pay rent, MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 厚生労働省) offers a program called the Housing Security Benefit (住居確保給付金, Jūkyo Kakuho Kyūfukin). It covers households where the primary breadwinner has been unemployed or their business has closed within the past two years, or where income from work has dropped, through no fault of the individual, to roughly the same level as unemployment. The benefit pays the actual rent amount — capped at a figure each municipality sets (equivalent to the housing assistance amount under Japan's public assistance system) — for three months in principle, extendable twice for a maximum of nine months total, and is paid directly by the municipality to the landlord or leasing agent rather than to the tenant. In Tokyo's special wards, the monthly cap is ¥53,700 (approx. USD 358) for a single-person household, ¥64,000 (approx. USD 427) for a two-person household, and ¥69,800 (approx. USD 465) for a three-person household.
Additional eligibility conditions apply: the household's most recent monthly income must not exceed the sum of a base amount plus the rent; total household savings must not exceed six months' worth of the base amount (capped at ¥1,000,000, approx. USD 6,667); and the recipient must be actively job-seeking through Hello Work (Japan's public employment service) or equivalent.
The point worth underlining is that this benefit covers rent specifically — the renewal fee itself is explicitly excluded. The realistic path, then, is to treat these as two separate problems solved two separate ways: consider applying for the Housing Security Benefit for your rent, and handle the renewal fee through a direct installment or reduction discussion with your landlord or management company. Applications and consultations go through your municipality's Self-Reliance Support Consultation Office (自立相談支援機関).
For readers familiar with the US Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program or the UK's Housing Benefit / Universal Credit housing element, this program is closer in spirit but narrower in scope and duration — a short-term, income-shock bridge capped at nine months, not an ongoing rent subsidy, and one that pointedly does not extend to Japan-specific charges like the renewal fee.
Source: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Livelihood Support Special Website, "Housing Security Benefit: Program Overview" (住居確保給付金 制度概要)
What Happens If You Ignore the Payment Entirely
If you leave the renewal fee unpaid with no contact at all, here is roughly how the situation can escalate. First, since a renewal fee clause exists in the lease, non-payment is treated as a breach of contract. Second, if you're using a rent-guarantee company, non-payment of the guarantee's renewal fee can cause the guarantee contract itself to lapse, at which point the landlord may demand you correct the situation. Third, the matter can progress toward proceedings seeking termination of the lease or eviction.
That said, if the requirements for statutory renewal are met, you cannot be required to move out for the sole reason of not having completed the renewal paperwork. The casebook cited earlier states that when a landlord refuses renewal, "if the requirements for statutory renewal are satisfied, the tenant is generally considered not required to move out." Not being able to pay and not communicating at all are two separate problems. A single message sent before the deadline dramatically widens the range of options actually available to you.
Five Things to Check on Your Renewal Documents Before You Sign
When your renewal notice arrives, check the following five points before you sign anything. Doing just this much prevents nearly every kind of problem that otherwise surfaces only after the fact.
- Are the renewal fee and the renewal administrative fee listed separately? They have a different character depending on whether the payee is the landlord or the agent. If the invoice shows only a combined figure, ask for the two amounts broken out.
- Has consumption tax been added on top of the renewal fee? The renewal fee on a residential unit is tax-exempt. Verify that the amount is exactly rent × number of months, with nothing added.
- Have the rent, common area fee, or lease term changed? Cross-check each item against your previous lease one by one. If any figure has increased, you're entitled to ask for the reasoning behind it.
- Have any special provisions been added? Check whether new terms on pets, musical instruments, parking, or the division of restoration costs have been slipped in. Agreed renewal is, in principle, based on mutual consent — but the casebook cited earlier notes that if a tenant does not clearly reject a notice of changed conditions and simply renews, the renewal is treated as having taken effect on the terms as presented. Flag anything you can't accept before you sign, not after.
- Are the renewal timing and amounts for fire insurance and the rent-guarantee company clearly stated? Since neither of these two items has a public benchmark rate, confirm the actual figures directly against your insurance policy and guarantee entrustment contract.
Your renewal documents are, in effect, a contract that sets your cost of living for the next two years. We cover the full lease process and the documents involved in our guide to the Japan rental contract process and required documents.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Q. How much is the renewal fee for a rental in Japan?
- A. It ranges from 0 months' rent to 1.4 months' rent depending on the region. In MLIT's 2007 survey, the average was 1.0 month in Tokyo, 0.8 months in Kanagawa, 1.0 month in Chiba, 1.4 months in Kyoto, 0.5 months in Saitama/Aichi/Fukuoka, and 0 months (no such custom) in Osaka/Hyogo. The exact figure that applies to you is whatever amount is written in your own lease's renewal fee clause.
- Q. When is the renewal fee due?
- A. It's typically due by the lease's expiration date, and the renewal notice usually arrives a few months beforehand. Because the total can be substantial, it's worth calculating the combined total of the renewal fee, renewal administrative fee, fire insurance premium, and guarantee renewal fee about three months before expiration, and setting that amount aside in advance.
- Q. Does consumption tax apply to the renewal fee?
- A. Not for a residential unit. Under NTA Tax Answer No. 6225, the non-refundable portion of a renewal fee associated with renewing a residential lease is exempt from consumption tax. Renewal fees on commercial buildings such as offices are taxable. The renewal administrative fee paid to the agent, however, is consideration for a service, so consumption tax does apply to it.
- Q. Is the renewal administrative fee paid separately from the renewal fee?
- A. Yes, they are distinct costs. The renewal fee is a one-time payment to the landlord, while the renewal administrative fee is consideration for the leasing/management agent's work — and MLIT's own survey form draws a clear line between the two. In the FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey, a renewal administrative fee applied to 44.4% of households, and it was exactly one month's rent for 69.7% of those.
- Q. Is a renewal fee still required under statutory renewal?
- A. It depends entirely on the exact wording of your lease. If the renewal fee clause is limited to "the case of agreed renewal," it can be read as not extending to statutory renewal — but if it says broadly "in the case of renewal," it can become a genuine point of dispute. Start by checking exactly how your own lease's renewal fee clause is worded. Note also that after statutory renewal, the lease becomes one of unspecified term, so the concept of a next renewal date disappears.
- Q. Can I refuse to pay the renewal fee?
- A. As a general rule, it's difficult. The Supreme Court's July 15, 2011 ruling held that a renewal fee clause stated clearly and specifically in the lease agreement is valid unless special circumstances exist, such as the fee being excessively high relative to the rent amount or renewal period. That said, if your lease contains no renewal fee provision at all, no payment obligation arises in the first place.
- Q. Can I negotiate rent at renewal?
- A. Yes. Article 32 of the Act on Land and Building Leases recognizes a tenant's right to request a rent reduction, grounded in a divergence from the rent of comparable nearby buildings. That said, because the Consumer Price Index's private-sector rent component moved only +0.6% year-on-year as of June 2026, a request to keep rent flat is considerably more likely to succeed than a request for a large reduction.
Related reading
Sources and References
- MLIT, "Survey on the Actual Conditions of Private Rental Housing (Real Estate Agents)" (民間賃貸住宅に係る実態調査(不動産業者)) (June 2007, 175 valid responses)
- MLIT, "Results of the Private Rental Housing Survey" press release (民間賃貸住宅実態調査の結果について) (June 29, 2007)
- MLIT, "FY2025 Housing Market Trend Survey Report" (令和7年度 住宅市場動向調査報告書) (July 2026)
- MLIT, "Housing Market Trend Survey" statistics information page (住宅市場動向調査)
- MLIT, "Casebook of Consultation Responses on Private Rental Housing (Revised Edition)" (民間賃貸住宅に関する相談対応事例集(再改訂版)) (March 2022, Research Group on Consultation Responses to Rental Housing Disputes)
- MLIT, "Casebook of Consultation Responses on Private Rental Housing" listing page
- MLIT, "Survey on Rental Housing Management Operations (Tenants)" (賃貸住宅管理業務に関するアンケート調査(入居者)) (2019, 310 tenants)
- MLIT, "Survey on Rental Housing Management Operations" survey overview
- MIC, "2020-Base Consumer Price Index, Nationwide, June 2026 (Reiwa 8)" (2020年基準 消費者物価指数 全国 2026年(令和8年)6月分)
- MIC Statistics Bureau, "FY2023 (Reiwa 5) Housing and Land Survey, Basic Tabulation on Housing and Households (Confirmed Results)" (令和5年住宅・土地統計調査 住宅及び世帯に関する基本集計(確報集計)結果)
- e-Stat, "2023 Housing and Land Survey: Rent of Rented Housing (by Prefecture and 21 Major Cities)" (令和5年住宅・土地統計調査 借家の家賃(都道府県・21大都市別))
- National Tax Agency, Tax Answer No. 6225, "Land Rent, House Rent, Key Money, Security Deposits, and Related Items" (地代、家賃や権利金、敷金など)
- National Tax Agency, Tax Answer No. 6201, "Transactions Exempt from Consumption Tax" (非課税となる取引)
- e-Gov Japanese Law Search, "Act on Land and Building Leases" (借地借家法) (Articles 26, 28, 29, 32, 38)
- MHLW Livelihood Support Special Website, "Housing Security Benefit: Program Overview" (住居確保給付金 制度概要)
